This "great idea" hasn't gone anywhere for good reasons. First, miles driven is not a good predictor of insurance claim costs. More important is where you drive. Rural drivers facing long distances on every trip would pay dearly with this system, but the urban drivers making shorter trips on crowded city streets have the most accidents. Good drivers would pay the same for insurance as poor risks. Drivers of large cars (poor gas mileage but good protection in case of accident) would pay more for insurance than drivers of small cars.
The only benefit of a pay-at-the-pump liability insurance scheme is that everyone would pay something. If the current crisis of uninsured motorists persists, that benefit might eventually outweigh the unfairness of the system. But we're not there yet. And that's the reason why this "great idea" hasn't gone anywhere.
No comments:
Post a Comment