The choices are:
- Continue to tax property
- Tax business activity, as Mr Hartman proposes
- Tax income, as Mr Huddleston proposes
- Tax consumption (sales), as I'm sure someone must be suggesting, but I don't know who.
The best way to assure a truly fair and equitable tax system is to ... Tax you. Tax me. Tax that fellow behind the tree. In fact, tax everything that moves. Don't tax any single source of revenue so much that it artificially favors one kind of economic activity over another. Instead, tax everything only as much as needed so that the cumulative tax burden is enough to finance society's needs, including a quality education system for the children of Texas. When taxpayers complain that they are being nickel and dimed to death, that's when we know the tax burden is spread evenly across all who live, work, and do business in Texas. Ironically, the almost universal unpopularity of such a proposal is what convinces me that it is truly the most fair and equitable. Which is why it doesn't stand a chance. Because taxpayers aren't really interested in fairness and equity. Their real goal is to ... Don't tax you. Don't tax me. Tax that fellow behind the tree.
No comments:
Post a Comment