Monday, April 13, 2009

Tier 1 research universities

The Nightly Build

UT-Dallas, Engine of Growth

Promoting the growth of UT-Dallas into prominence as a nationally recognized research university is a goal that made a brief appearance in the recent forum for candidates for Richardson's city council. One candidate, Gary Slagel, raised the subject unprompted by any audience question. He identified the Richardson university as being an engine for growth for the whole city. It's an example of an issue the campaign for city council should be focusing on instead of the mean-spirited politics of personal destruction the campaign is descending into instead.

The Fort Worth Star-Telegram recognizes the importance of having a local Tier 1 university. The paper calls attention to the fact that DFW is the state's largest metropolitan area and has no Tier 1 research university. UT-Dallas, UT-Arlington and University of North Texas have the potential but need state help to achieve the next level of greatness.

There are some tiny steps being taken in this year's legislative session in Austin. The Senate passed a resolution by Sen. Robert Duncan of Lubbock calling for a source of funding for state research institutions. Unfortunately, it would only apply to universities that have already reached that Tier 1 status, not to aspiring schools like UT-Dallas. Senate Bill 9 submitted by Sen. Judith Zaffirini of Laredo corrects that omission, but has its own drawbacks. According to the Fort Worth Star-Telegram:

"It would enable emerging research universities and other schools in Texas to compete for more state funding based on such criteria as their number of graduates in certain critical fields, their growth in research funding from business and government sources, their numbers of graduates each year and their ability to search out private gifts. The problem, of course, is that Zaffirini's bill has no funding."

Paul Burka has identified a potential source of funding, but even he doesn't seem to recognize the need for more Tier 1 research universities.

"The Legislature should abolish the emerging technology fund. The state has no business investing in start-ups. This is just wheeling and dealing with public funds that carries a huge potential for abuse and inside dealing. Lawmakers should take the $250 million appropriation and allocate it to the state's major research universities. Unlike the governor's office, the universities DO know who the world class researchers are, and they can use the money to recruit them from other states that are suffering worse budget crises than we are. As for the Enterprise Fund, used for closing deals, I would cut it in half and give the rest to the research universities."
All well and good, except Texas needs a few more Tier 1 research universities. The sad truth is that the Texas legislature still doesn't have a consensus on that. And, with a few exceptions, the candidates for Richardson city council don't seem to notice. And that's a shame. The city's future economic prosperity could could suffer because of it.

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

Ed - I completely agree with your assessment of UTD - and yes, Slagel, did mention this at a forum recently; however, Slagel has to go. No one disputes the good that he has done over 22 years on council, but the last few haven't been pretty. Bad judgement on ethical issues, allegations of conflicts of interest, running his business out of city hall then a city building - the list just goes on and on. I understand your angst about change for change sake - I really do - but when do you finally say "enough"? Signed A former Slagel fan

Ed Cognoski said...

I disagree that Slagel hasn't been good for Richardson recently. It's his private business dealings that are questionable, not his service on the council. Do I wish I never heard of STARTech? Certainly. But as long as he understands Richardson's needs and has the knowledge, experience and ability to meet those needs, I see no need to replace him with a novice council member.

Anonymous said...

Among other things, I'm not sure how running your business out of city hall or a city building are "private business matters". Since when? What I hear you saying is that ethics and integrity don't matter, right?

Ed Cognoski said...

"Anonymous", Slagel's private business has been a facilitator of start-up high-tech businesses. That coincides with what I believe is a needed goal of the city of Richardson, too. Do I wish he had kept a higher wall between the two? Yes. Do I think he's still the best qualified candidate to stimulate economic growth in Richardson? Yes.