Friday, June 30, 2006

The media vs. the President - again

DallasBlog.com | William Murchison:
“The media's part in sniffing out and disclosing this country's strategy for combating the terrorists suggests that many media types, functioning as they do in the sublime glow of the First Amendment, value longrange American interests less than they do an opportunity to stick it to the White House.”
Ed Cognoski responds:

One could as easily argue that it is the press that has America's longrange interests at heart -- interests in protecting Americans' liberties and the Bill of Rights, including the Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. It's people like William Murchison who are willing to throw out those liberties in exchange for a little false sense of security. And who are willing to overlook our loss of liberty for an opportunity to stick it to The New York Times.

But that, too, would be wrong. The New York Times is just doing its job of investigating and reporting what's going on in Washington -- good or bad. It's news that it's interested in. When the news is good, it doesn't deserve praise for upholding American values. And when the news is bad, it doesn't deserve blame for undermining those values. Praise and blame belong to the players The New York Times is reporting on. And, more and more, regarding how this war is being prosecuted, it's blame that those players deserve.

Thursday, June 29, 2006

Indian police arrest Mother Teresa nuns on "attempted conversion charges"

DallasBlog.com | Tom Pauken:
“Religious tensions between Hindus and Christians remain high in India as fanatical Hindu groups step up their harassment of Christians who are a minority in that country.”
Ed Cognoski responds:

Mr Pauken doesn't have to go all the way to India to find stories about groups wanting to use the power of the state to promote their religion. The Republican Party of Texas just adopted a platform that declares that the US is a "Christian nation" and separation of church and state is just a "myth."

Mr Pauken fears that Christianity is threatened by Islam and Hinduism. He passes on stories from news outlets like the Union of Catholic Asian News that support his fears. He overlooks stories close to home that indicate Christians are also capable of insisting on a favored position in societies where they constititute a majority. It's not religious intolerance he rejects; it's religious intolerance by those who don't share his own Christian faith. Because of that, his efforts only fan the flames of intolerance.

Wednesday, June 14, 2006

What a mouth: Yes, Ann Coulter exaggerates, but she's got a point

[Ed says Nay] Dallas Morning News | Mark Davis:
“So, here's the deal – let's all be big boys and girls and realize that anyone intentionally entering a vigorous arena of debate is fair game. And instead of wasting our time hand-wringing over whose style wounds our sensibilities, let's focus on who has a point and who does not.”
Ed Cognoski responds:

So, let's focus on the point. The women in question are criticizing this nation's response to 9/11. Ms Coulter and her apologist Mark Davis are trashing the women's reputations. Who has a point worthy of respect? It's a no-brainer. And I'm not referring to Mr Davis.

I can understand why Coulter and Davis act as they do. Ms Coulter is selling books, mostly to right wing nuts. Mr Davis makes a living from inciting the same audience on talk radio. The politics of personal destruction plays very well with their audience.

What I don't understand is why The Dallas Morning News is a party to this. Providing space for a diversity of opinion on the op-ed pages is one thing. But opinion that crosses the line from reasoned debate to vicious personal attacks has no place in civil society. This isn't a legal question. Ms Coulter may have a legal right to write what she has. Mr Davis has a legal right to squeal in delight over the outrage generated by her reprehensible remarks. It's a question of sound editorial judgment. The DMN failed miserably in this case.

Tuesday, June 13, 2006

One country, one language

[Ed says Nay] DallasBlog.com | William Murchison:
“If we want to embed Spanish in the daily routines and rhythms of 21st century America, let's keep putting up signs in department stores explaining, in Spanish, which products are where. And let's keep offering, on recorded telephone messages, the opportunity to press "Numero Uno" in order to hear Spanish. Most of all, perhaps, let's keep providing ballots and political information in Spanish. Caramba! Madre mia! What a bunch of idiocy on the part of, you would have thought, intelligent Anglos.”
Ed Cognoski responds:

It's not idiocy. It's the free market at work. Shopowners catering to their customers. Assessing what the market wants and providing it. The businessmen who understand this, thrive. Those that want only to push some ethnocentric political philosophy ("English only") will probably watch their customers take their business down the street. That's the way it should be. That's America.

Besides putting a straightjacket on the free market, Mr Murchison has some other strange notions. He says Mexico doesn't cater to English-speakers. Has he never visited Mexico? Has he never travelled the world? English signage may not be universal, but in most parts of world, it's not surprising to see signs in two or more languages -- the local language(s) and English. In many parts of the world, including many places in Mexico, you can use US cash.

Mr Murchison explains the growing accomodation of Spanish-speakers as arising from some White-anglo-guilt factor. Nonsense. Americans may be late in recognizing that there is profit to be made in catering to a diverse customer base, but the successful businesmen "get it".

Mr Murchison sees a need to learn American "values and history." There, we agree. So, let's focus on improving the state of education in America. There are plenty of Americans whose ancestors have been in this country for many generations who can't identify Thomas Jefferson. The current group of Texas leaders seems to think public education is a public nuisance, to be rooted out instead of nurtured. To be denied to those who speak Spanish. Lots of luck in instilling American history and values with that approach, Mr Murchison.

Friday, June 09, 2006

Craddick calls for gubernatorial commission on appraisals

[Ed says Yea] DallasBlog.com:
“Speaker Tom Craddick is calling for the creation of a gubernatorial commission on appraisal issues in Texas. Craddick first called for the commission during his speech to delegates at the Republican state convention. ‘The average person out there is seeing their appraisals going up and up, and they are leery of (promised) tax cuts because it’s just going to be (eaten up) by appraisal creep,’ Craddick told the San Antonio Express News.”
Ed Cognoski responds:

For sure, a commission is needed. But not to handicap appraisal districts more than they are already are. Appraisal districts are prevented by law from having access to all the sales data they need to set accurate appraisals. Still, they seem to be doing a reasonable job, anyway, despite the common belief that appraisals are being jacked up to raise taxes. The Dallas Central Appraisal District says appraisals increased 6%, on average, in Dallas County this year. Compare that with what's happening to sales prices. Appraisals are going up because property values go up, whether you spend money on improvements or not. There's a real estate bubble in this country. It hasn't entirely bypassed Dallas County. For most homeowners (i.e., those that don't plan on dying in their current home), that's a good thing.

The appraisers don't always get it right, house by house. But it's not because they are out of control, aggressive, arbitrary, whatever. It's because they are denied by law from getting access to all the sales data. If you want appraisal districts to do a more accurate job in every neighborhood, press legislators to give them the sales data the local appraisers need, not to put yet more artificial caps on appraisals. That will lead only to even more cock-eyed results than what people believe is happening already.

Thursday, June 08, 2006

White House certainly has changed its tune on Iran

[Ed says Yea] Dallas Morning News | Carl Leubsdorf:
“The administration's approach both to Iran and to North Korea, the third member of the terrorist triumvirate that Mr. Bush targeted as an "axis of evil," will differ in its final 30 months from the unilateral, pre-emptive approach the president took in deciding to overthrow Iraqi President Saddam Hussein. That means more emphasis on diplomacy and economic muscle and less likelihood that Mr. Bush would use military means to keep the North Koreans and Iranians from developing nuclear weapons.”
Ed Cognoski responds:

The change is welcome. Perhaps the best news of all is how quiet the war hawks have been about this change in policy. If it had been a Democratic President suggesting we use diplomacy and multilateral solutions instead of military solutions, cries of weakness, appeasement and surrender would be filling the talk radio airwaves by now.

Maybe next, the President will invite former Presidents Clinton and Carter to the White House for consultation on how diplomacy and economic pressure work. OK, that's hoping for too much. I'd settle for this President just listening a little to his Dad.

Wednesday, June 07, 2006

Gore's 'Inconvenient Truth" is more like science fiction

[Ed says Nay] Dallas Morning News | Mark Davis:
“With the release of An Inconvenient Truth, the former vice president has cemented on film a distinction I have long observed: Some people are to be debated, and others are so unhinged that they forfeit a seat at the table of reason. ... But with our planet's history of vast temperature cycles and its amazing propensity for cleaning up events from volcano eruptions to oil spills, the notion that man can change the global climate seems to be a flimsy premise for draconian laws sought by global-warming fearmongers.”
Ed Cognoski responds:

There are three truths about global warming:

  • Global warming is real.
  • It is human-induced.
  • It is serious.
Ostriches like Mr Davis have for years vehemently denied these truths. More recently, they are beginning to grudgingly concede, slowly, point by point. Mr Davis here admits that global warming is real. President Bush goes a step further: "We know that the surface of the Earth is warmer, and that an increase in greenhouse gases caused by humans is contributing to the problem." The last refuge is in refusing to accept that the issue is serious enough to take serious action.

Mr Davis' arguments are reminiscent of the tobacco industry's response to the growing scientific case against smoking. First, deny the correlation between smoking and cancer. Then, accuse public health advocates of a post hoc, ergo propter hoc logical fallacy because a causal connection wasn't proven. Leave readers with the false impression that if any non-smokers die of cancer, then smoking cannot be the cause of smokers dying of cancer.

In the case of global warming, Mr Davis would have you believe that because earth's climate has experienced natural fluctuation in the past, that all such fluctuations must be natural. In fact, the direct line from burning fossil fuels to increased greenhouse gas emissions to a greenhouse effect on the atmosphere to global warming is overwhelmingly accepted by the scientific community. The tobacco industry was always able to trot out some supposed expert or other to deny the danger of smoking. So, too, with global warming. Mr Davis would have you believe that there is still serious debate in the scientific community about the truths of global warming. It's simply not true.

Former Vice President Gore was one of the first legislators to recognize the potential of the Internet. His leadership accelerated its development and deployment, to everyone's great benefit. He was also one of the first government leaders to recognize how serious is the threat of global warming. Once again, Mr Gore's foresight is being proven correct. A hundred years from now, Americans will look back and appreciate his vision and wisdom about these great turning points of his day. And regret that their ancestors didn't listen to him. That, instead, they let their hatred for liberals and, more specifically, environmentalists, and Al Gore in particular, cause them to become "so unhinged that they forfeit a seat at the table of reason." Mr Davis' own place at that table has been empty for a long time.

Monday, June 05, 2006

The Texas GOP: Out of touch with real-world realities

[Ed says Nay] DallasBlog.com | Vince Leibowitz:
“If you happen to be one who has never taken part in the political process or voted in an election and looked at the conventions of Texas' two major parties this year in hopes of trying to determine which party was most closely aligned with your beliefs, chances are you reviewed some of the voluminous media coverage directed toward this weekend's Republican Party of Texas Convention and wondered if, in fact, the people at the podiums and drafting the platforms had any grasp on reality at all.”
Ed Cognoski responds:

It's dangerous to assert that a political party that has been winning every statewide election for a decade is somehow out of touch with voters. The GOP overreach may allow Democrats to pick up a few local elections here and there, but the legislature, the governorship, and the Texas Congressional delegation will remain firmly under GOP control in 2006.

Nationally, the country has been much more closely divided. The GOP governing majority may be slipping, but it's because of incompetence and hypocrisy, not because the country itself is changing core beliefs. Like it or not, guns, God and gays, abortion and amnesty are still wedge issues that drive deep and determine election results.

Sunday, June 04, 2006

Candidates: It's Test Time

[Ed says Yea] Dallas Morning News | Editorials:
“This is a test. It's only a test, but Project Vote Smart's questionnaire reveals a lot about political candidates. Namely, whether they're willing to shoot straight with voters and offer basic information about policies they support.”
Ed Cognoski responds:

This is an excellent initiative. More and more, it's the voters who are endlessly surveyed, focus grouped, dissected and sliced and diced and targeted by politicians and their election campaigns. We are bombarded with poll results telling us what the voters supposedly think. It's about time that the candidates themselves respond to the surveys. Let the voters know their answers to the questions most on the minds of the voters. And not the evasive, non-answer answers that politicians typically provide during interviews and debates. No, instead, let them answer yes or no to the survey questions like the rest of use are forced to do.

And, for the sake of complete disclosure, maybe political columnists ought to take the National Political Awareness Test, too, so readers know where they stand. For the record, the editorial position of Ed Cognoski is as follows:

2006 CONGRESSIONAL NATIONAL POLITICAL AWARENESS TEST

Abortion Issues: Indicate (X) which principles you support 
    (if any) regarding abortion.
___ a) Abortions should always be illegal.
___ b) Abortions should always be legal.
___ c) Abortions should be legal only within the first 
       trimester of pregnancy.
_X_ d) Abortions should be legal when the pregnancy 
       resulted from incest or rape.
_X_ e) Abortions should be legal when the life of the 
       woman is endangered.
___ f) Prohibit public funding of abortions and to 
       organizations that advocate or perform abortions.
___ g) Other or expanded principles: Abortions should be 
       legal within the first trimester of pregnancy.

Budgetary, Spending, and Tax Issues:

Using the key, indicate what federal funding levels you 
support for the following general categories. Select one 
number per category, you can use a number more than once.

KEY
1 = Greatly Increase
2 = Slightly Increase
3 = Maintain Status
4 = Slightly Decrease
5 = Greatly Decrease
6 = Eliminate

1) Budget Priorities
_4_ a) Agriculture       _3_ i) Medical research
_3_ b) Arts              _2_ j) National parks
_3_ c) Defense           _3_ k) Public health services
_3_ d) Education         _2_ l) Scientific research
_2_ e) Environment       _5_ m) Space exploration programs
_3_ f) Homeland security _3_ n) Transportation and highway 
                                infrastructure
_2_ g) International aid _3_ o) Welfare
_3_ h) Law enforcement   _2_ p) Emergency preparedness
                         ___ q) Other or expanded categories
                                __________________________

2) Defense Spending
_2_ a) Armed forces personnel training         
_2_ b) Intelligence operations                 
_3_ c) Military hardware                       
_3_ d) Modernization of weaponry and equipment 
_6_ e) National missile defense                
_2_ f) Pay for active duty personnel
_2_ g) Programs to improve troop retention rates
_3_ h) Research and development of new weapons
_2_ i) Troop and equipment readiness
___ j) Other or expanded categories ______________________

Using the key above, indicate what federal tax levels 
you support for the following general categories. 
Select one number per category.

3) Taxes
   Income Taxes:                       
    Family Income                       
    _4_ a) Less than $25,000            
    _3_ b) $25,000-$75,000              
    _2_ c) $75,000-$150,000             
    _1_ d) Over $150,000                
    ___ e) Other or expanded categories 
           ____________________________ 
    Retiree Income                      
    _3_ f) Over $40,000
    ___ g) Other or expanded categories 
           ____________________________
    
   Other Taxes:                        
    _2_ a) Alcohol taxes                
    _2_ b) Capital gains taxes          
    _1_ c) Cigarette taxes              
    _3_ d) Corporate taxes              
    _2_ e) Gasoline taxes               
    _3_ f) Inheritance taxes            
    ___ g) Other or expanded categories 
           _____________________________
    
   Deductions/Credits:
    _3_ a) Charitable contributions
    _3_ b) Child tax credit
    _3_ c) Earned income tax credit
    _3_ d) Medical expense deduction
    _3_ e) Mortgage deduction
    _3_ f) Student loan credit
    ___ g) Other or expanded categories
    ___    ____________________________
    
4) Do you support the permanent repeal of the 
   federal estate tax? ___ Yes _X_ No ___ Undecided
5) Do you support making President Bush's tax cuts 
   permanent? ___ Yes _X_ No ___ Undecided
6) Discuss your proposals for balancing the federal budget. 
   ________________________________________________________
   ________________________________________________________
   ________________________________________________________
7) Other or expanded principles ___________________________
   ________________________________________________________
   ________________________________________________________

Campaign Finance and Government Reform Issues: 

Indicate (X) which principles you support (if any) regarding campaign
finance and government reform.

_X_ a) Support public taxpayer funding for federal 
       candidates who comply with campaign spending limits.
___ b) Increase the amount individuals are permitted to 
       contribute to federal campaigns.
___ c) Prohibit Political Action Committee (PAC) 
       contributions to candidates for federal office.
___ d) Allow unregulated soft money campaign contributions 
       to political parties or committees.
___ e) Remove all contribution limits on federal 
       campaigns and parties.
_X_ f) Require Section 527 organizations to register with 
       the Federal Election Commission as Political Action Committees.

g) Do you support instant run-off voting? _X_ Yes ___ No ___ Undecided
h) Should Election Day be a national holiday? __ Yes _X_ No ___ Undecided
i) Do you support a constitutional amendment that would define 
   marriage as a union between a man and woman? __ Yes _X_ No ___ Undecided
j) Other or expanded principles ___________________________
___________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________

Crime Issues: Indicate (X) which principles you support (if any) regarding crime.
___ a) Support the use of the death penalty for federal crimes.
_X_ b) Eliminate the use of the death penalty for federal crimes.
_X_ c) Support programs to provide prison inmates with educational, 
       vocational and job-related skills and job-placement assistance 
       when released.
_X_ d) Support programs to provide prison inmates with drug and 
       alcohol addiction treatment.
___ e) Reduce prison sentences for those who commit non-violent crimes.
_X_ f) Require that crimes based on gender, sexual orientation, 
       and disability be prosecuted as federal hate crimes.
___ g) Impose stricter penalties for those convicted of corporate crimes.
___ h) Minors accused of a violent crime should be prosecuted as adults.
___ i) Other or expanded principles _______________________
       ____________________________________________________
       ____________________________________________________

Drug Issues: Indicate (X) which principles you support (if any) regarding drugs.
___ a) Support mandatory jail sentences for selling illegal drugs.
_X_ b) Expand federally sponsored drug education and drug treatment programs.
_X_ c) Decriminalize the possession of small amounts of marijuana.
_X_ d) Allow doctors to recommend marijuana to their patients for medicinal purposes.
_X_ e) Increase border security to stop the flow of illegal drugs into the United States.
___ f) Eliminate federal funding for programs associated with the "war on drugs."
___ g) Support a federal law to standardize testing and penalties for steroid use in professional sports.
___ h) Other or expanded principles________________________
       ____________________________________________________
       ____________________________________________________

Education Issues: Indicate (X) which principles you support (if any) regarding education.
___ a) Support national standards for and testing of public school students.
_X_ b) Allow parents to use vouchers, (equal opportunity scholarships) 
       to send their children to any public school.
___ c) Allow parents to use vouchers, (equal opportunity scholarships) 
       to send their children to any private or religious school.
_X_ d) Allow teachers and professionals to receive authorization 
       and funding to establish charter schools.
_X_ e) Reward teachers with merit pay for working in low-income schools.
_X_ f) Increase funding for school capital improvements 
       (e.g. buildings, infrastructure, technology).
_X_ g) Support affirmative action in public college admissions.
_X_ h) Increase funding of programs such as Pell grants and 
       Stafford loans to help students pay for college.
_X_ i) Support federal tax incentives to help families save for college.
___ j) Other or expanded principles _______________________
       ____________________________________________________
       ____________________________________________________

Employment and Affirmative Action Issues:
1) Indicate (X) which principles you support (if any) regarding employment.
_X_ a) Increase funding for national job-training programs 
       that retrain displaced workers or teach skills needed in today's job market.
___ b) Reduce government regulation of the private sector 
       in order to encourage investment and economic expansion.
_X_ c) Provide tax credits or grants to businesses that offer 
       child care services to employees.
_X_ d) Encourage employers to offer flex-time scheduling, 
       comp-time, and unpaid leave for family emergencies.
___ e) Eliminate all federal programs designed to reduce unemployment.
_X_ f) Increase the federal minimum wage.
_X_ g) Support the right of workers to strike without fear of being permanently replaced.
_X_ h) Include sexual orientation in federal anti-discrimination laws.
___ i) Other or expanded principles ________________________
       _____________________________________________________

2) Indicate (X) which principles you support (if any) regarding affirmative action.
___ a) The federal government should consider race and gender in government contracting decisions.
___ b) The federal government should discontinue affirmative action programs.
_X_ c) The federal government should continue affirmative action programs.
___ d) Other or expanded principles_________________________
       _____________________________________________________
       _____________________________________________________

Environment and Energy Issues: Indicate (X) which principles you support (if any) regarding the environment and energy.
_X_ a) Strengthen the regulation and enforcement of the Clean Water Act.
_X_ b) Strengthen the regulation and enforcement of the Clean Air Act.
_X_ c) Support Clear Skies Act to reduce power plant emissions by setting a national cap on pollutants.
___ d) Require states to compensate citizens when environmental regulations limit uses of privately-owned land.
___ e) Relax logging restrictions on federal lands.
___ f) Relax standards on federal lands to allow increased recreational usage.
___ g) Support increased development of traditional energy resources (e.g. coal, natural gas, oil).
_X_ h) Strengthen emission controls and fuel efficiency standards on all gasoline and diesel-powered engines, including cars, trucks, and sport
       utility vehicles.
___ i) Support opening a portion of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge for oil exploration.
_X_ j) Encourage further development and use of alternative fuels to reduce pollution.
_X_ k) Support the use of ethanol as an alternative fuel.
_X_ l) Allow energy producers to trade pollution credits.
_X_ m) Support the Kyoto Protocol to limit global warming.
___ n) Other or expanded principles_________________________
       _____________________________________________________
       _____________________________________________________

Gun Issues: Indicate (X) which principles you support (if any) regarding guns.
_X_ a) Reauthorize the ban on the sale or transfer of semi-automatic guns, except those used for hunting.
_X_ b) Maintain and strengthen the current level of enforcement of existing federal restrictions on the purchase and possession of guns.
___ c) Ease federal restrictions on the purchase and possession of guns.
___ d) Repeal federal restrictions on the purchase and possession of guns.
_X_ e) Allow citizens to carry concealed guns.
_X_ f) Require background checks on gun sales between private citizens at gun shows.
_X_ g) Require a license for gun possession.
___ h) Other or expanded principles: 
       Require training in gun use, safety, and laws for gun owners.
       _____________________________________________________
       _____________________________________________________

Health Issues: Indicate (X) which principles you support (if any) regarding health care.
___ a) Providing health care is not a responsibility of the federal government.
_X_ b) Implement a universal health care program to guarantee coverage to all Americans regardless of income.
_X_ c) Expand eligibility for tax-free medical savings accounts.
___ d) Establish limits on the amount of punitive damages awarded in medical malpractice lawsuits.
_X_ e) Support expanding prescription drug coverage under Medicare.
_X_ f) Offer tax credits to individuals and small businesses to offset the cost of insurance coverage.
_X_ g) Support automatic enrollment of children in federal health care programs such as CHIP and Medicaid.
_X_ h) Support stem cell research on existing lines of stem cells.
_X_ i) Allow laboratories to create new lines of stem cells for additional research.
___ j) Other or expanded principles _________________________
       ______________________________________________________
       ______________________________________________________

Immigration Issues: Indicate (X) which principles you support (if any) regarding immigration.
___ a) Decrease the number of legal immigrants allowed into the country.
___ b) Establish English as the official national language.
_X_ c) Support a temporary worker program that would enable 
       illegal immigrants to work in the United States legally.
___ d) Relax restrictions barring legal immigrants from using 
       government funded social programs (e.g. public housing, food stamps).
_X_ e) Support amnesty for illegal immigrants already working in the United States.
___ f) Other or expanded principles _________________________
       ______________________________________________________
       ______________________________________________________

International Aid, International Policy, and Trade Issues:

International Aid: Indicate (X) which principles you support (if any) regarding United States economic assistance.
_X_ a) Aid should be granted to countries when extraordinary circumstances cause disaster and threaten civilian lives.
_X_ b) Aid should be granted to countries when it is in the security interests of the United States.
___ c) Aid should be eliminated for any nation with documented human rights abuses.
___ d) International Aid programs should be scaled back and eventually eliminated.
___ e) Other or expanded principles__________________________
       ______________________________________________________
       ______________________________________________________

International Policy
1) Middle East
a) Should the United States continue to provide leadership 
   in the Israeli-Palestinian peace process? 
   _X_ Yes ___No ___ Undecided
b) Should the United States support the creation of a Palestinian state? 
   _X_ Yes ___No ___ Undecided
c) Should the United States withdraw its troops from Iraq? 
   _X_ Yes ___No ___ Undecided
d) Should the United States send more troops to Iraq? 
   ___ Yes _X_No ___ Undecided
e) Discuss your proposals for an exit strategy in Iraq.
    _________________________________________________________
    _________________________________________________________
    _________________________________________________________
    _________________________________________________________
f) Other or expanded principles______________________________
   __________________________________________________________
   __________________________________________________________

2) Central and East Asia.
a) Should the United States use diplomatic and economic pressure 
   to encourage North Korea to abandon its nuclear weapons program? 
   _X_ Yes ___ No ___ Undecided
b) Should the United States use military force to dismantle 
   the North Korean nuclear weapons program? 
   ___ Yes _X_ No ___ Undecided
c) Should the United States remove the North Korean government from power? 
   ___ Yes _X_ No ___ Undecided
d) Should the United States increase financial support to Afghanistan? 
   _X_ Yes ___ No ___ Undecided
e) Should the United States increase military support to Afghanistan? 
   ___ Yes _X_ No ___ Undecided
f) Other or expanded principles______________________________
   __________________________________________________________
   __________________________________________________________

3) United Nations.
a) Should the United States maintain its financial support of the United Nations? 
   _X_ Yes ___ No ___ Undecided
b) Should the United States decrease its financial support of the United Nations? 
   ___ Yes _X_ No ___ Undecided
c) Should the United States commit troops to United Nations peacekeeping missions? 
   _X_ Yes ___ No ___ Undecided
d) Other or expanded principles _____________________________
   __________________________________________________________
   __________________________________________________________

4) Should the United States lift the travel ban to Cuba? 
   _X_ Yes ___ No ___ Undecided
5) Should the United States increase its financial support 
   to Colombia to combat "the war on drugs?" 
   _X_ Yes ___ No ___ Undecided
6) Should aid to African nations for AIDS prevention programs 
   fund distribution of contraceptives? 
   _X_ Yes ___ No ___ Undecided
7) Should aid to African nations for AIDS prevention programs 
   fund abstinence education? 
   _X_ Yes ___ No ___ Undecided
8) Other or expanded principles _____________________________
   __________________________________________________________
   __________________________________________________________

International Trade: 

1) Do you support the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA)? 
   _X_ Yes ___ No ___ Undecided
2) Do you support the Central American Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA)? 
   _X_ Yes ___ No ___ Undecided
3) Do you support the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT)? 
   _X_ Yes ___ No ___ Undecided
4) Do you support continued U.S. membership in the World Trade Organization (WTO)? 
   _X_ Yes ___ No ___ Undecided
5) Should a nation's human rights record affect its normal trade
   relations (most favored nation) status with the United States? 
   _X_ Yes ___ No ___ Undecided
6) Do you support the trade embargo against Cuba? 
   ___ Yes _X_ No ___ Undecided
7) Should trade agreements include provisions to address environmental 
   concerns and to protect workers' rights? 
   _X_ Yes ___ No ___ Undecided
8) Other or expanded principles _____________________________
   __________________________________________________________
   __________________________________________________________

National Security:

a) Do you support using military tribunals to try suspected terrorists 
   when ordinary civilian courts are deemed inappropriate or impractical? 
   ___ Yes _X_ No ___ Undecided
b) Should the United States grant law enforcement agencies greater 
   discretion to read mail and email, tap phones, and conduct 
   random searches to prevent future terrorist attacks? 
   _X_ Yes ___ No ___ Undecided
c) Should the United States hold foreign states accountable 
   for terrorists who operate in their country? 
   _X_ Yes ___ No ___ Undecided
d) Should the federal government increase funding to states 
   and cities for homeland security? 
   _X_ Yes ___ No ___ Undecided
e) Do you support the prohibition of torture or cruel, inhuman, 
   or degrading treatment or punishment of prisoners in U.S. custody? 
   _X_ Yes ___ No ___ Undecided
f) Do you support a policy of pre-emptive military strikes against 
   countries deemed to be a threat to U.S. national security? 
   ___ Yes _X_ No ___ Undecided
g) Other or expanded principles ______________________________
   ___________________________________________________________
   ___________________________________________________________

Social Security Issues: Indicate (X) which principles you support (if any) regarding Social Security.
___ a) Allow workers to invest a portion of their payroll tax 
       in private accounts which they manage themselves.
___ b) Allow workers to invest a portion of their payroll tax 
       in private accounts managed by private firms contracted by the government.
___ c) Invest a portion of Social Security assets collectively in 
       stocks and bonds instead of United States Treasury securities.
___ d) Increase the payroll tax to better finance Social Security in its current form.
___ e) Lower the annual cost-of-living increases.
_X_ f) Raise the retirement age for individual eligibility to receive full Social Security benefits.
___ g) Other or expanded principles___________________________
       _______________________________________________________
       _______________________________________________________

Technology and Communication Issues: Indicate (X) which principles you support (if any) regarding technology and communication.
___ a) Collect taxes on commercial Internet transactions.
_X_ b) Continue the moratorium on Internet taxation.
___ c) Implement government regulation of Internet content.
___ d) Support government mandates to curtail violent and 
       sexual content on television.
_X_ e) Support strict penalties for Internet crimes 
       (e.g. hacking, identity theft, worms/viruses).
_X_ f) Support legislation to detail how personal information 
       can be collected and used on the Internet.
___ g) Regulating the Internet is not a responsibility of the federal government.
___ h) Other or expanded principles. __________________________
       ________________________________________________________
       ________________________________________________________

Welfare and Poverty Issues: Indicate (X) which principles you support (if any) regarding welfare and poverty.
___ a) Require welfare recipients to spend at least 40 hours 
       a week in a combination of work and training programs.
_X_ b) Increase funding for child care programs.
_X_ c) Continue to give states and local governments flexibility 
       in and responsibility for welfare programs through federal block grants.
___ d) Direct federal poverty aid through religious, community-based or other non-profit organizations.
___ e) Abolish all federal welfare programs.
_X_ f) Support housing assistance for welfare recipients.
___ g) Other or expanded principles____________________________
       ________________________________________________________
       ________________________________________________________

Legislative Priorities: On an attached page, disk, or via email, please
explain in a total of 75 words or less, your top two or three priorities
if elected. If they require additional funding for implementation,
please explain how you would obtain this funding.

Friday, June 02, 2006

Benedict XVI travels to predecessor's homeland

[Ed says Nay] DallasBlog.com | Tom Pauken:
“Benedict XVI is the right man for the moment to address a threat that may turn out to be even more serious than Soviet-driven Communism -- the rise of the forces of militant Islam across the globe.”
Ed Cognoski responds:

Mr Pauken is obsessed with his perception of invading hordes of Muslims overrunning Christian Europe. As for me, I just don't see Islam as being a greater threat than was Soviet Communism. Heck, even today, some readers of the Dallas Blog judge our biggest threat as being Chinese Communism (usually called CHICOM, perhaps indicating someone who is frozen in time in the Vietnam War era, although it reminds me of baseball box scores for the CHISOX). Ideology isn't everything. I hope the Pope has someone in the Vatican briefing him on the influence oil has in the world.

Noting gun battles at the border Perry provides border security plan

[Ed says Nay] DallasBlog.com | Scott Bennett:
“With voluntary participation of private landowners, Texas will use $5 million to begin placing hundreds of surveillance cameras along criminal hotspots and common routes used to enter this country. ... ‘We will post this video on the Internet – in real time – so that concerned Americans can help protect our nation through online neighborhood watch programs.’ ”
Ed Cognoski responds:

Americans are being "frog boiled" with regard to video surveillance. Frog boiling refers to the folk wisdom that the way to cook a live frog is to put it in a pot of cold water and slowly raise the temperature, because putting a frog in already hot water will only cause it to reflexively jump out.

Americans were first introduced to video surveillance in stores, to prevent shoplifting in department stores and robberies in convenience stores. Reactions were negative at first, but the practice is now universal and universally accepted. Come on in, the water's fine!

The controversy today has moved to law enforcement using surveillance cameras on public streets, to prevent red-light running, car break-ins and muggings. With government involved, the controversy is being played out in legislatures, in courts, in elections. Despite initial vociferous opposition, the cameras are slowing gaining currency. The temperature's rising!

Governor Perry's plan increases the heat a little more. Now, government is proposing to enlist private citizens to monitor these webcams as part of a law enforcement effort. Whereas, in the past, private citizens might sit at home listening to the police band radio just for entertainment, they can now be a part of law enforcement. Don't think this will be restricted to border patrol in remote areas. Eventually, we'll have cameras in more heavily populated areas. Imagine cameras placed outside bars, where citizens around the country can watch patrons stagger out at closing time, maybe zooming in on their cars' license plates, then calling 911 to report possible drunken driving. Or how about cameras on the street outside strip clubs and adult bookstores, so upholders of common decency can monitor from the comfort of their own homes who frequents such places? Boiled alive and liking it!

Take Us to Your Leader: Dems could use one, and an agenda, by fall

[Ed says Nay] Dallas Morning News | Editorials:
“Newt Gingrich, the architect of the 1994 GOP takeover of the House, advised the Democrats to run the fall campaign on one simple slogan: ‘Had enough?’ Cool heads among the party's strategists recognize that basing a strategy on voter disgust with the GOP is pretty shaky. Democrats need to give voters something to vote for, instead of merely someone to vote against.”
Ed Cognoski responds:

The problem is not that Democrats don't offer something to vote for. The problem is that Democrats do such a poor job of enunciating just what it is that they stand for.

Democrats need their own "Contract with America" and may still come up with something before this fall's elections. The famous 1994 Republican "Contract with America" was not revealed until late in that mid-term election. Democrats should be able to craft a compelling message around a whole host of issues that President Bush and the Republican Congress have stumbled on so badly in recent years. For example...

  • homeland security -- ports, chemical plants, infrastructure
  • disaster preparedness -- public health, first responders
  • energy independence -- conservation, alternative energy development
  • environmental responsibility
  • worker rights - minimum wage rise, job protection and creation
  • protection of Social Security and private pensions
  • affordable health care
  • investment in education
  • restoration of international alliances and extrication from Iraq
  • crackdown on corporate corruption
Whether the Democrats get their act together enough to agree on some basic principles in these areas remains to be seen. Democrats have not recently shown particular skill in organization, discipline, or communication. I've seen nothing yet to tell me that the 2006 election will be any different.

Thursday, June 01, 2006

A better school calendar

[Ed says Nay]Dallas Morning News | Senator John Carona (R-Dallas):
“House Bill 1, the recent school finance legislation, contains a series of public education enhancements, including a provision that requires Texas schools to start no sooner than the fourth Monday in August. ... Texans want their summers back for good reasons. Longer summers provided by the traditional school year give families more opportunities to spend quality time together. ... The benefits don't stop with stronger families. ... Content mastery and retention of material are improved when content is introduced, a break is taken, the information is reviewed, and the test is then taken. ... Moving the school calendars to a traditional school year would save $184 million for Texas schools and more than $790 million statewide ... in operational costs ”
Ed Cognoski responds:

Senator Carona lays out three arguments for a later starting date for school.

First, that a later start date somehow lengthens summer. But starting school in September doesn't make for a longer summer vacation. It just shifts the vacation. State law mandates 180 days of instruction. Unless that number changes, families will have the same number of days of quality time together. All that's at stake is whether those days come in late May or in late August.

Second, Senator Carona argues that a ten to fourteen day Christmas break is conducive to content mastery and retention. If Senator Carona truly believes that a two week break before finals improves education, he ought to be arguing for a two week break in both semesters. How about a two week break in early June before finals in late June?

Finally, Senator Carona argues that shutting schools during the hot days of August instead of the comparatively mild days of May would save schools some air conditioning costs. This final argument is the only legitimate argument Senator Carona offers for shifting the school year.

Whether or not Senator Carona's arguments are convincing, the state should not be setting local school calendars at all. Senator Carona claims that the Legislature is being responsive to a "a grass-roots movement of parents and community members." School boards already seek input from parents and community members when they set their annual calendars. If local voters aren't making the school calendar an issue in school board races, why should Senator Carona elevate it to a state legislature priority? Perhaps because it's not parents and community members who want to see later school start dates, but the tourism industry. Industry finds it easier to influence the state legislature than to influence hundreds of local school board. And Senator Carona is willing to let the heavy hand of the state override local control in order to placate the wants of the tourism industry.